#WORLD OF TANKS VS WAR THUNDER MOD#

In World of Tanks, there's more hitpoints, so if you're hit you probably won't die immediately. Don't be there -If there, don't be seen -If seen, don't be acquired -If acquired, don't get shot at -If shot at, don't get hit -If hit, don't get penetrated -If penetrated, don't die. I've seen some people complain about one shot kills, but it's not really that much a problem. War Thunder is better if you want a more 'sim' experience. (Disclaimer: I've paid WG thousands of dollars over the years probably about 2.5~3k, still enjoy the game, but I only played it casually-with a singular exception to win a clanwar campaign reward, the IS-5.) That approach will put you in the top 50% of players. It's a critical perspective you'll need if you want to enjoy the game.Īpproach the game as if it is biased against you play to gather, hold, and exploit every advantage in spite of it. People who have fun when they do better tonight than last night, and the night before, have fun most if not all of the time. People who only have fun when they win will only have fun 50% of the time, as the game is designed to do. As long as you focus on improving your play, you'll have fun. It's not like Maplestory or War Thunder where you hit nearly insurmountable soft paywalls. that does take some time.) As long as you play better than the average player, you will progress and be rewarded more than the average player. Thankfully, there's no great wall to overcome other than yourself or your progression (tanks do best when you have unlocked all modules, attached equipment, and gotten 2-3 crew skills. Anyone can clear a marathon on a moped, but finishing a marathon takes great personal resolve and determination. In fact, going faster costs real-life money. WoT was designed for you to keep a variety of tiers to play, and for you to play them frequently. WG pushes you to rush to tier 10, and then spend all of your time in tier 10. Recent changes have harshly intruded on this, in my opinion, but this foundation still exists, and it will break the back of anyone who dares think otherwise. Knowing what will happen when you click battle kills the long-term gameplay value. A game you can consistently win at is not unpredictable. That's what makes it replayable: the unpredictability. People play poorly, sometimes extraordinarily 'rare' RNG screws over some key tank on the enemy team, etc. The game is designed such that winning is not something you can predict. They are matchmade with players and against players to draw them towards 50%. Some players absolutely do hold 67% winrates. So while it has obvious concessions to casual arcade gameplay, like the accuracy RNG and map design, it also has concessions to real-life weaknesses and drawbacks of tanks, like a single artillery piece representing a battery, with the damage that imposes.įinally, WoT is not meant to be a game you win.

#WORLD OF TANKS VS WAR THUNDER MOD#

World of Tanks feels like someone modded a simulator for casual multiplayer arcade gameplay, the same way people mod guns and zombies into Minecraft. Two, World of Tanks is not a simulator, but the mechanics are setup as if it is one. The way it's biased are generally subtle outside of tier 10. Some key differences: World of Tanks actually has less Soviet Bias. It sounds like you're just curious about swapping games from peeping your profile.

World of tanks vs war thunder